After reading the assignments for IDSE 401, I completed a chart to depict the different authors point of view. On one access I thought of showing a linear progression between future design and traditional design. To me this represents how I felt the authors focused on when deciding how they want to make design decisions.
The authors on the bottom part of the chart used more traditional examples to depict the environment to make informed design decisions. When discussing emotions I feel that they are trying to focus on a more humanities approach to design. This would involve areas such anthropology, philosophy, and sociology to inform the designer on where to discover clues when making decisions.
The authors on the top use more future (not currently existing) design ideas to make decisions. Sanders is the best example of this with her emphasis on the individual that is the ideal user being the center of all decisions.
-Chart depicting the different understandings I interpreted from the reading.
The half of the graph showing Human Focused/Computer Centered is how I feel the authors view interaction. The authors on right side explore the ability to allow technology to function ethnographically. While the authors on the left support methods of human to human ethnography. The authors in this section depicted the human computer interaction relationship and the process of ubiquitous computing. On the the far end of this chart is Mann and his discussion of engaging technology to capture every aspect of his life. I feel it pushes the interaction of computer centered design. Altogether the readings depict important fundamentals when exploring environments for design.No Comments »